Reviewer Guidelines
The Albanian Journal of Biomedical Sciences (AJBS) relies on the expertise and professionalism of its reviewers to ensure the quality, integrity, and scientific value of published research.
Role of Reviewers
Reviewers are expected to provide objective, constructive, and timely evaluations of submitted manuscripts. Their feedback plays a critical role in assisting editorial decisions and improving the quality of the work.
Confidentiality
All manuscripts under review must be treated as confidential documents. Reviewers must not share, distribute, or use the content for personal or professional advantage.
Objectivity and Constructive Feedback
Reviews should be conducted objectively, focusing on the scientific merit of the manuscript. Comments should be clear, constructive, and aimed at helping authors improve their work.
Evaluation Criteria
Reviewers are asked to consider the following aspects:
- Originality and relevance of the study
- Scientific and methodological rigor
- Clarity of presentation and organization
- Validity of results and conclusions
- Adequacy of references
Ethical Considerations
Reviewers should:
- Declare any conflicts of interest
- Decline the review if they feel unqualified
- Report any suspected plagiarism or ethical concerns
Timeliness
Reviewers are expected to complete their evaluations within the requested timeframe. If unable to meet the deadline, they should inform the editorial office promptly.
Recommendations
Reviewers are asked to provide one of the following recommendations:
- Accept
- Minor Revision
- Major Revision
- Reject
Communication
All communication regarding the manuscript should be conducted through the journal’s editorial system.
The AJBS editorial team appreciates the valuable contribution of reviewers in maintaining high academic standards.